Saturday, February 09, 2013

Part 8: The U.S. National Contact Point: Corporate Social Responsibility Between Nationalism, Internationalism and Private Markets Based Globalization

 (Pix Source HERE)


This Blog Essay site devotes every February to a series of integrated but short essays on a single theme. For 2013 this site introduces a new theme: The U.S. National Contact Point: Corporate Social Responsibility Between Nationalism, Internationalism and Private Markets Based Globalization.

Part 8:  The Context of Specific Instance Statements Among OECD NCPs; a Study in Contrasts.

This series builds on some ideas I have been working through for a number of years relating to a fundamental shift in the approaches to corporate governance that broaden the ambit of corporate governance issues from a singular focus on internal governance (the relationships among officers, shareholders and directors) to one that includes corporate behavior and the standards by which officers, directors and shareholders exercise their respective governance authority. This shift also changes the scope of what is understood as "law" to be applied to issues of corporate governance, from one principally focused on national law to governance norms that may be sourced in the declarations and other governance interventions of public and private international bodies. Lastly, it appears to point to an evolution to the role of the state from the principal source of standards and enforcer of law to a vehicle for the implementation of international standards  in which enforcement power is left to global market actors--principally consumers and investors function of the decisions of global actors.  All of this is inconsistent with traditional notions of the role of law, the scope of corporate governance and the nature of corporate social responsibility int he United States.  The extent to which the United States participates in the construction of these autonomous international systems may suggest the direction in which government policy may be moving away from the traditional consensus of corporate responsibility to something perhaps entirely new.

This post focuses on the self conception of the U.S. National Contact Point under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011) (MNE Guidelines). Subsequent posts will consider the American National Contact Point within the context of the NCP system and note the divergence of the US approach to that of important European counterparts by considering its specific instance jurisprudence.
 
 

Part 8:  The Context of Specific Instance Statements Among OECD NCPs; a Study in Contrasts.

This page carries a list of statements or press releases issued by National Contact Points with regard to specific instances which have arisen in the implementation of the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.  These statements can also be accessed via the government websites of the countries concerned.

Argentina / Argentine
Australia / Australie
Austria / Autriche
Belgium / Belgique
Canada
Chile / Chili
France
Finland / Finlande
Ireland / Irlande
Germany / Allemagne
Japan
Mexico / Mexique
Netherlands / Pays-Bas
Norway / Norvège
Sweden / Suède
Switzerland / Suisse
United Kingdom / Royaume Uni
United States / Etats-Unis

No comments:

Post a Comment