Residents in the Kyrgyz capital celebrated Constitution Day on Wednesday with the city's streets in full bloom and a new government promising to turn the troubled state into an oasis of democracy in authoritarian Central Asia. . . . "We are surrounded by authoritarian countries, and now we want to become the first to introduce a real, working democracy,” said Mirzad Adzhiyev, an activist with the Kebel youth movement and a member of the Constitutional Council that is drafting the new document.
If the constitution is approved in a referendum scheduled for June 27, political observers say Roza Otunbayeva, head of the provisional government, could become the first female president of a post-Soviet country outside the Baltic states.
DECREE OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENTOF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC 
On the referendum (nation wide vote)on adoption of the new Constitutionof the Kyrgyz Republic
1. On April 7, 2010 the popular revolution swept away the regime of antipopular president. The unique opportunity for the establishment of a truly democratic order has emerged in the country.2. The necessity to adopt new Constitution creating the conditions for stabilization of social, political and economic situation in the country and further development of democracy is more than evident.3. The Provisional Government of the Kyrgyz Republic is convinced that the new Constitution will draw a line for the tradition of authoritarian transformation of the state power.4. In order to elicit the will of the population of Kyrgyzstan, which is the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of state power, in accordance with the Decree No 1 dated April 7, 2010, the Provisional Government of the Kyrgyz Republic hereby adopts the following Decree:a. To call the referendum (nation wide vote) on the entire territory of the Kyrgyz Republic on Sunday, June 27, 2010.b. To submit for approval of the citizens of the Kyrgyz Republic during the referendum the draft Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic "On enactment of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic" (attached).c. To approve the following wording of the question to be included in the ballot paper for voting:5. “Adopt the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic “On enactment of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic”, which were submitted for the referendum (nation wide vote) as drafts by the Provisional Government
NO _______________________________________________(mark as appropriate in the square based on your preferred choice)”.
d. The Central Commission on elections and referenda of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Ministry of finance of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Ministry of internal affairs of the Kyrgyz Republic shall:- solve the issues of organizational, material and financial support to the referendum as well as other issues resulting from this Decree;
- during the preparation and conducting of the referendum ensure public order, observance of the Constitution and laws of the Kyrgyz Republic.e. The Central Commission on elections and referenda of the Kyrgyz Republic in close cooperation with the executive power agencies and local self governance bodies shall ensure organized referendum, oversight over the compliance with the legislation as well as shall systematically inform the public on the process of its preparation and conduct.f. It is hereby established that the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic adopted at the referendum (nation wide vote) shall have the highest legal force and shall be not subject to any approval whatsoever.
The case of Kyrgyz politics via “the mob” presents issue of whether there can be positive relationship between Western ideal democracy and “the mob.” Generally speaking, it is difficult to justify “mob rule” as a tool (or means) to promote democracy. Mob rule is problematic for obvious reasons. This is because the concept of “the mob” is contra distinguishable to the ideal of democracy. In modern times, “mob rule” represents the decline rather than fostering of democracy.
Chlopecki, after first characterizing “mob rule” as “mobocracy”, contends, “The mobocracy does not derive from democracy itself, but from its decline.” In addition, just as the examples of Hitler and Stalin presented “dramatically opposed types of demagogic leadership”, the examples of Kyrgyzstan and “mob rule” and China and its “proletariat democracy” also present contrasting forms of democracy, which are also in stark contrast to Western ideal democracy.
4. The following shall be prohibited in the Kyrgyz Republic:
1) merger of state, municipal and party institutions; establishment and activity of party organizations in state and municipal institutions and organizations; carrying out party activity by civil and municipal servants except for the cases when such activity is implemented outside their official duties;
2) membership of those serving in the army, law-enforcement agencies as well as judges in political parties as well as their statements in support of any political party;
3) creation of political parties on religious or ethnic basis as well as pursuit of political goals by religious associations;
4) creation of militant formations by associations of citizens;
5) activity of political parities, public and religious organizations, their representations and branches in the event that such structures pursue political goals aimed at forced change of the constitutional setup, undermining national security, incitement of social, racial, inter-national, inter-ethnic and religious hatred.
El Gobierno de Kirguizistán ha reconocido su impotencia para imponer el orden en el sur de esa república centroasiática y ha pedido ayuda militar a Rusia después de que los enfrentamientos en Osh y otras ciudades con fuerte minoría uzbeka continuaran anoche y esta mañana, causando ya 63 muertos y más de 800 heridos. (The Kyrgyz Government has acknowledged its inability to impose order in the south of the Central Asian republic and requested military aid to Russia after clashes in Osh and other cities with strong minority Uzbek continued last night and this morning, causing 63 deaths and and over 800 wounded.)
The historic and cultural differences between the Kyrgyz and Uzbek peoples - descendants of nomadic and agricultural cultures respectively - run deep.
More recent disputes have fuelled this ancient antagonism, including conflicts over borders and natural gas, which Uzbekistan supplies to Kyrgyzstan.
Against this unfavourable background, the Uzbeks are struggling to find ways to express their identity. Their main forum is the Assembly of the People of Kyrgyzstan, which represents the republic's minority groups.
This body serves to control - as well as represent - the minorities, and has the status of a consultative organ of government under President Askar Akaev.
The power of a constitutional document to paper over these strong cultural, linguistic, and other distinctions, will be important not only in states like Kyrgyzstan, but also for places like Iraq, Pakistan, Israel-Palestine and a number of African countries cobbled together at the whom of powerful outsiders and then told to behave like a unified state. The conflation of ethnic identity with national rights--the great bane of the 19th century in Europe--continues to assert a great force. While it might be subsumed within the great ideological cultural politics that produce coherent multi-ethnic states in the largest nations, ethno-nationalism remains a potent destabilizing force in smaller states. And global elites are of two minds when it comes to the consequences of ethno-nationalism. Sometimes, as in the case of Kosovo, the 19th century reflex to equate national and ethnic borders proves too hard to resist (even as it creates smaller unit ethnic minorities within new borders). Other times, as in the case of Iraq, Turkey and Iran, ethno-nationalism is viewed as incomprehensible and suppressed (with appropriate hand wringing about methodology). And int he case of Israel-Palestine, the global elite's thinking has not yet hardened, even after over half a century of Israeli independence. Kyrgyzstan serves as another front in this war. It will likely get its new constitution. Uzbeks will likely be pacified. And the state will remain effectively disjoined, and thus weakened to the advantage of its neighbors. And that, especially with respect to smaller multi-ethnic states, may best serve the interests of the more powerful states who find such instability useful for the assertion of their power within those places.