(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)
Flora Sapio
(FS), Beitita Horm Pepulim (BHP), and I (LCB) continue our experiment
in collaborative dialogue. We move from the individual to the social
self as we work toward a philosophy of the individual. While at first
blush this appears to be well worn ground--who hasn't, over the course
of the last 5,000 years, in every civilization with a recorded history
NOT spent vast amounts of time thinking about the social self? But much
of this thinking starts at the social and works through the issues of
control, management and socialization of the individual. That is, they
start from the core premise that the individual is the object of a
project for which the social serves as an instrument and as an ends. In
the spirit of the emerging philosophy of the individual, we propose to
invert the conversation--to start with the individual and work through
the issues of control, management, and individuation of the social.
But we move from the individual in herself, to the individual as subject
and as symbol, as something which, when observed and transformed from
itself to the idea or symbol of itself, assumes a quite distinct, and
useful, position for the organization of selves--and for the structure
and operation of the law of the social. To that end our conversation
will likely flow around and through the following:
1--the social self as the reflection of the mother
2--the social self as a reflection of the family
3--social self as a reflection/result of one's ancestors
4--the social self as a reflection of God
5-the social self as a refection of the state
6--the social self as terrorist
7--the social self as orthodox
This conversation, like many of its kind, will develop naturally, in fits and starts. Your participation is encouraged.
In this post Flora Sapio (FS) responds to earlier comments


