
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)
Flora Sapio (FS), Beitita Horm Pepulim (BHP), and I (LCB) continue our experiment in collaborative dialogue. We move from the
individual to the
social
self as we work toward a philosophy of the individual. While at first
blush this appears to be well worn ground--who hasn't, over the course
of the last 5,000 years, in every civilization with a recorded history
NOT spent vast amounts of time thinking about the social self? But much
of this thinking
starts at the social and works through the issues of control, management and
socialization of the individual. That is, they start from the core premise that the individual is the object of a project for which the social serves as an
instrument and as an
ends. In the spirit of the emerging philosophy of the individual, we propose to invert the conversation--
to start with the individual and work through the issues of control, management, and
individuation of the social.
But we move from the individual in herself, to the individual as subject
and as symbol, as something which, when observed and transformed from
itself to the idea or symbol of itself, assumes a quite distinct, and
useful, position for the organization of selves--and for the structure
and operation of the law of the social. To that end our conversation
will likely flow around and through the following:
1--the social self as the reflection of the mother
2--the social self as a reflection of the family
3--social self as a reflection/result of one's ancestors
4--the social self as a reflection of God
5-the social self as a refection of the state
6--the social self as terrorist
7--the social self as orthodox
This conversation, like many of its kind, will develop
naturally, in fits and starts. Your participation is encouraged.
In
this post Flora Sapio comes back to the mother in the formation of the social self with a nod to the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Contents HERE.